728 x 90

The Moon Is Not What You Think It Is.

Howake.com -

The Moon Is Not What You Think It Is.

The moon is so perfectly positioned that because of where it is when we have an eclipse it is a size as the Sun that's why we have the Eclipse and the authors of who built the moon say this the moon is bigger than it should be apparently older than it should be and much lighter in mass than it should be it authorized an unlikely orbit and is so extraordinary that all existing explanations for its presence are fraught with difficulties and none of them could considered remotely watertight when you go on you say where'd the moon come from you get this story and like so much in what we call science that people take it as fact it's actually a theory which repeated becomes fact but then you go back you find that it's the theory and the first one is the moon was created by what's known as the wack theory or the big whack theory and that is that a Mars type planet came in smack the earth great chunk came off and became the moon when the physics of that didn't work out they came up with the double whack theory where the Mars type planet hit the earth bit comes off or whatever and then the Mars type planet thinks war I'll give him even one with a right if you want the left comes back and whacks it again the old one to talk about bloody desperate and the truth is and and and honest scientists will tell you they have no bloody clue where the moon come from and it shouldn't by physics be there this guy Isaac Osmond off a Russian professor by macaƩ chemistry did a lot of writing on this sort of stuff and he said this quite rightly we cannot help but come to the conclusion that the moon by rights ought not to be there the fact that it is is one of those strokes of luck almost too good to accept small planets such as Earth with weak gravitational fields might well lack satellites in general then when a planet does have satellites those satellites are much smaller than the planet itself therefore even if the earth has a satellite there would be every reason to suspect that at best it would be a tiny world perhaps thirty miles in diameter but that is not so Earth is not only has a satellite but it is a giant satellite 2160 miles in diameter how is it then that their tiny earth has one amazing some scientists don't even talk about a planet satellite relationship but a planet planet relationship the moons bigger than Pluto the best explanation for the moon is observational error the moon doesn't exist that scientists said another one from NASA it seems easier to explain the non-existence of the moon than its existence and then we get the hollow moon this is what I'm saying and others have said is that it's a hollowed-out planetoid in November 1969 the moon was hit by a lunar module to the equivalent of one ton of TNT the shockwaves built up and NASA scientists said the moon rang like a bell more assuring a co-director of the seismic experiment told the news conference as for the meaning of it I'd rather not make a good reputation right now but it is though someone had struck a bell say in the belfry of a church a single blow and found that the reverberation from it continued for 30 minutes it got a bigger smack eventually which I'll come to Frank press from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology MIT said that for a rather small impact to produce an effect that lasted for 30 minutes was quite beyond the range of our experience this is a guy called Gordon McDonald he said in the early 1960s it would seem that the moon is more like a hollow than a homogeneous sphere and this guy from MIT said the lunar orbiter experiments had vastly improved knowledge of the moon's gravitational field and indicated the frightening possibility that the moon might be Hollow now we'll come to this bigger whack a launch vehicle struck the moon with the equivalent of 11 tons of TNT and NASA scientists said the moon reacted like a gong and continued to vibrate for three hours and 20 minutes to a depth of up to 25 miles Ken Johnson a supervisor of the data and photo control department during the Apollo missions told who built the moon author Alan Butler that the moon not only rang like a bell but the whole moon wobbled in such a precise way that it was almost as though it had gigantic hydraulic dampers struts inside it these two Russian scientists from the Soviet Academy of scientists wrote an article in 1970 in Sputnik magazine in Russia headed is the moon the creation of an alien intelligence and all these years later you'd indicate to the fact that they were right what they point out and others point out is the outer service of the moon is extremely hard and contains minerals like titanium moon rocks have been found to contain processed metals including brass and mica and the elements uranium 236 and neptunium 237 that have never been found to occur naturally uranium 236 is a long-lived radioactive nuclear waste and is found in spent nuclear fuel and reprocessed uranium neptunium 237 is a radioactive metallic element and a byproduct of nuclear reactors and the production of plutonium some lunar rocks have been found to contain ten times more titanium than titanium rich rocks on earth titanium is used in supersonic jets deep diving submarines and the spacecraft dr. Harold array the winner of the Nobel Prize for chemistry said he was terribly puzzled by the rocks from the moon and in particular their titanium content he said the samples were mined blower's and that he could not account for the titanium the two Russian scientists said in their article if a material had to be devised to protect a giant artificial satellite from the unfavorable effects of temperature from the cosmic radiation and meteorite bombardment the experts would probably have kit upon precisely these refractory metals refractory metals are incredibly resistant to heat and where in that case is it not clear why lunar rock is such an extraordinarily poor heat conductor a factor which so it Mays the astronauts wasn't that what the designers of this super Sputnik of the earth were after from the engineer's point of view this spaceship of ages long pass which we call the moon is superbly constructed they say it's a hollowed-out planetoid and they say if you're going to launch an artificial Sputnik that it is advisable to make it Hollow at the same time it would be naive to imagine that anyone capable of such a tremendous space project would be satisfied simply with some kind of giant empty trunk hurled into near-earth trajectory it is more likely that what we have here is a very ancient spaceship the interior of which was filled with fuel for the engines and materials and appliances for repair work navigation instruments observation equipment and all manner of machinery in other words everything necessary to enable this Caravelle of the universe to serve as a Noah's Ark appropriate of intelligence perhaps even as the home of a whole civilization envisaging a prolonged thousands of millions of years existence and long wanderings through space thousands of millions of miles naturally the hull of such a spaceship must be super tough in order to stand up to the blows and meteorites and sharp fluctuations between extreme heat and extreme cold probably the shell is a double layered affair the basis is a dark armoring of about 20 miles in thickness and outside of it some kind of more loosely packed covering a thinner layer averaging about three miles in certain areas where the lunar seas and craters are the upper layer is quite thin in some cases non-existent


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply